Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-01-16

J.Samuel & Ors vs Gattu Mhesh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (CIVIL) 811
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
J.Samuel & Ors
Respondent
Gattu Mhesh & Ors
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
J. Chelameswar, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the High Court's decision to allow an amendment to the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, after the conclusion of trial. The Court held that such amendments can be permitted to ensure that the real controversy between the parties is adjudicated, provided they do not cause injustice to the other party. The Court upheld the High Court's order, emphasizing the importance of allowing amendments for the sake of justice and effective adjudication.

J.Samuel & Ors vs Gattu Mhesh & Ors · Niyam