Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-02-23

RE-RAMLILA MAIDAN INCIDENT DT 4/5.06.11 vs HOME SECRETARY AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2011/60541
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RE-RAMLILA MAIDAN INCIDENT DT 4/5.06.11
Respondent
HOME SECRETARY AND ORS.
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
SWATANTER KUMAR B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the principles governing Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India, alongside the restrictions under Articles 19(2) and 19(3). The Court emphasized the necessity of balancing individual rights against public order when exercising jurisdiction under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of free speech while recognizing that it is not absolute and must be weighed against other societal interests, establishing a legal principle of 'balancing of interests' in the context of civil liberties.

RE-RAMLILA MAIDAN INCIDENT DT 4/5.06.11 vs HOME SECRETARY AND ORS. · Niyam