Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-02-13

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.FARIDABAD vs M/S FOOD & HEALTHCAARE SPECIALIT.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/21797
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.FARIDABAD
Respondent
M/S FOOD & HEALTHCAARE SPECIALIT.
Author
D.K. JAIN
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE D.K. JAIN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in this case, addressed appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the Tribunal's order that quashed a demand for additional excise duty under Section 11A and penalties under Rule 173Q of the 1944 Rules and Rule 25(1) of the 2001 Rules. The Court held that the Assessee, engaged in blending and packing for Heinz, was not the manufacturer and thus not liable for the excise duty, as the Tribunal correctly determined that Heinz was the actual manufacturer. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.FARIDABAD vs M/S FOOD & HEALTHCAARE SPECIALIT. · Niyam