Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-02-15

KRUSHNAKANT B. PARMAR vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/22822
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRUSHNAKANT B. PARMAR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA G.S. SINGHVI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant, a Security Assistant, for unauthorized absence from duty, violating Rule 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iii) of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964. The Court found that the Inquiry Officer's report, which established the charges beyond reasonable doubt, was valid despite the appellant's claims of bias and procedural lapses. The dismissal was confirmed as the appeal against it was deemed time-barred and lacking merit.

KRUSHNAKANT B. PARMAR vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam