Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-02-01

Jik Industries Ltd. & Ors vs Amarlal V.Jumani & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 1079
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jik Industries Ltd. & Ors
Respondent
Amarlal V.Jumani & Anr
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, Asok Kumar Ganguly

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the sanction of a scheme under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 does not equate to compounding an offence under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court clarified that an unsecured creditor's non-opposition to a scheme does not preclude them from filing a criminal complaint for pre-compromise debts. The High Court's dismissal of the writ petitions was upheld, affirming that the complaint proceedings under the N.I. Act remain unaffected by the scheme's sanction.

Jik Industries Ltd. & Ors vs Amarlal V.Jumani & Anr · Niyam