Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-02-23

Re-Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt ... vs Home Secretary And Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Re-Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt ...
Respondent
Home Secretary And Ors
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
B.S. Chauhan, Swatanter Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the principles governing Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India, alongside the restrictions under Articles 19(2) and 19(3). The Court emphasized the need for a balancing of interests approach when adjudicating cases involving freedom of speech and public order, referencing Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The judgment reinforces that while free speech is a fundamental right, it is not absolute and must be weighed against other societal interests, particularly in maintaining public order.

Re-Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt ... vs Home Secretary And Ors · Niyam