Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-12-11

GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA vs U.P INDL.DEV.CORPN.LTD

Citation / case number
SC 2011/28057
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA
Respondent
U.P INDL.DEV.CORPN.LTD
Author
SWATANTER KUMAR A.K. PATNAIK
Bench
SWATANTER KUMAR A.K. PATNAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that applications for compensation under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP Act) are not maintainable without prior separate proceedings alleging unfair trade practices under Section 10 or Section 36B of the MRTP Act. The Court affirmed the Competition Appellate Tribunal's dismissal of the appellants' compensation applications, citing the precedent set in Saurabh Prakash v. DLF Universal Ltd. [(2007) 1 SCC 228]. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's interpretation of the MRTP Act's procedural requirements.

GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA vs U.P INDL.DEV.CORPN.LTD · Niyam