Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-12-11

Purno Agitok Sangma vs Pranab Mukherjee

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2012 SC 423
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Purno Agitok Sangma
Respondent
Pranab Mukherjee
Bench
Altamas Kabir, P. Sathasivam, J. Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the procedure for challenging the election of the President of India, emphasizing that such challenges must adhere to the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, specifically Sections 14 and 14A, which limit the grounds for challenge and the parties eligible to file petitions. The Court reiterated that Article 329(b) and Article 71 of the Constitution delineate the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in these matters, thereby affirming that election disputes concerning the President and Vice-President are to be resolved only by this Court. The judgment underscores the necessity of following statutory provisions for election petitions, thereby upholding the legislative framework governing such electoral challenges.

Purno Agitok Sangma vs Pranab Mukherjee · Niyam