Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-08-09

RAJOO @ RAMAKANT vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/16119
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJOO @ RAMAKANT
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
MADAN B. LOKUR A.K. PATNAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Rajoo was entitled to legal representation in the High Court as a matter of right under Article 39-A of the Constitution, which mandates free legal aid to ensure justice is accessible to all citizens. The Court emphasized that Sections 12 and 13 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, do not differentiate between trial and appellate stages, thus entitling eligible persons to legal services at any stage. The conviction of Rajoo was upheld, but the Court's ruling clarified the importance of legal representation in ensuring fair trial rights.

RAJOO @ RAMAKANT vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam