Dr.Mehmood Nayyar Azam vs State Of Chattisgarh And Ors

The Supreme Court emphasized the fundamental principle of human dignity, stating that it is enshrined in the Constitution and must be protected against humiliation, particularly in the context of public law remedies. The Court criticized the High Court's requirement for the appellant, a doctor and social activist, to submit a representation to the State Government for compensation after 19 years, deeming it an unreasonable burden. The Court held that the appellant's dignity and rights must be upheld, and the High Court's order was set aside, allowing for direct compensation claims.