Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-04-23

SANGEETABEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 2011/32467
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SANGEETABEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT
Author
B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of double jeopardy under Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, does not apply as the offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and Sections 406/420 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are distinct. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's application for quashing the FIR and criminal case, ruling that the appellant could be tried for both offences without violating double jeopardy principles.

SANGEETABEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT · Niyam