Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-04-26

UNION OF INDIA vs MADHU E.V.

Citation / case number
SC 2001/22441
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
MADHU E.V.
Author
R.M. LODHA
Bench
H.L. GOKHALE R.M. LODHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that constables of the Border Security Force (BSF) who resigned after 10 years of service are not entitled to pensionary benefits under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, as the minimum qualifying service for pension is 20 years. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the respondents' resignation under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules did not entitle them to pension benefits, affirming the interpretation of relevant rules. The appeal by the Union of India was dismissed, confirming the lower court's ruling.

UNION OF INDIA vs MADHU E.V. · Niyam