Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-04-02

Jegannathan vs Raju Sigamani & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 3788
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jegannathan
Respondent
Raju Sigamani & Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
H.L. Gokhale, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the maintainability of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, following the remand of a suit by the appellate court. The Court held that the appellate court has the authority to remand cases under Order 41 Rules 23, 23A, and 25, depending on the nature of the decree being appealed. The dismissal of the appeal by the High Court was upheld, affirming that the review petition was also rightly dismissed, thus maintaining the appellate court's decision to remand the case for fresh consideration.

Jegannathan vs Raju Sigamani & Anr · Niyam