Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-04-23

Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 2844
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel
Respondent
State Of Gujarat & Anr
Author
B.S. Chauhan
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, B.S. Chauhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of double jeopardy under Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 does not apply in this case, as the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC are distinct from the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court clarified that being tried for different offences arising from the same set of facts does not constitute double jeopardy. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the quashing application was therefore dismissed, affirming the ongoing proceedings under IPC.

Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat & Anr · Niyam