Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2012

Supreme Court of India · 2012-04-26

Union Of India & Ors vs Madhu E.V. & Anr

Citation / case number
2012 AIR SCW 3269
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India & Ors
Respondent
Madhu E.V. & Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
H.L. Gokhale, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the entitlement of Border Security Force (BSF) constables to pensionary benefits upon resignation under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969. The Court held that despite the minimum qualifying service for pension being 20 years as per the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, those who resigned under Rule 19 could still claim pensionary benefits as per Rule 49(2)(b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant pension to the respondents, affirming that the acceptance of resignation included pensionary benefits on compassionate grounds.

Union Of India & Ors vs Madhu E.V. & Anr · Niyam