ANIL GILURKER vs BILASPUR RAIPUR KSHETRIA GRAMIN BANK ANR

The Chhattisgarh High Court held that the disciplinary action against the appellant, a Branch Manager, was invalid due to the vagueness of the charge-sheet, which failed to specify the documents or names of individuals involved in the alleged misconduct under Regulation 30(1) of the Staff Service Regulations. The court emphasized that vague charges do not meet the standards of due process, referencing precedents such as Surath Chandra Chakrabarty v. State of West Bengal and Union of India & Ors. v. Gyan Chand Chattar. Consequently, the court quashed the order of removal and reinstated the appellant.