Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-15

A.P.INDSTL.INFRASTRUCTURE CORPN.LTD. vs CHINTHAMANENI NARASIMHA RAO .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/26579
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A.P.INDSTL.INFRASTRUCTURE CORPN.LTD.
Respondent
CHINTHAMANENI NARASIMHA RAO .
Author
ANIL R. DAVE
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Sections 4(1), 5A, and 6. The Court held that the invocation of Section 17 to dispense with the inquiry under Section 5A was improper, leading to the quashing of the declaration under Section 6. Consequently, the Court affirmed the High Court's decision to allow the writ appeal, thereby invalidating the acquisition process initiated by the State.

A.P.INDSTL.INFRASTRUCTURE CORPN.LTD. vs CHINTHAMANENI NARASIMHA RAO . · Niyam