Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-26

M/S L.N.Gadodia & Sons & Anr vs Regional Provident Fund Commr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 273
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S L.N.Gadodia & Sons & Anr
Respondent
Regional Provident Fund Commr
Author
H.L. Gokhale
Bench
H.L. Gokhale, J.M. Panchal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner erred in clubbing two sister concerns under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The Court held that the enforcement officer's decision to club the companies was justified based on the commonality of directors and the registered office, despite the petitioners' claims of distinct business operations. The Court upheld the application of Section 7A of the Provident Funds Act, affirming the enforcement officer's findings and dismissing the petitioners' appeal.

M/S L.N.Gadodia & Sons & Anr vs Regional Provident Fund Commr · Niyam