Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-12

Rajendra Singh Verma (D) Thr.Lrs vs Lt.Governor Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (SUPP) 515
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajendra Singh Verma (D) Thr.Lrs
Respondent
Lt.Governor Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr
Author
J.M. Panchal
Bench
H.L. Gokhale, J.M. Panchal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of compulsory retirement orders under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules and Rule 33 of the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, 1970. The Court held that the decision to retire judicial officers must be based on a thorough assessment of their performance and service records, emphasizing the need for transparency in the evaluation process. The Court found that the appellants' compulsory retirements were not justified due to procedural lapses and lack of proper communication regarding their ACRs, leading to the quashing of the retirement orders.

Rajendra Singh Verma (D) Thr.Lrs vs Lt.Governor Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr · Niyam