Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-02

Arun Kumar Aggarwal vs State Of M.P.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 3056
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arun Kumar Aggarwal
Respondent
State Of M.P.& Ors
Author
H.L. Dattu
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, H.L. Dattu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's quashing of the Special Judge's order was erroneous as it disregarded the necessity of sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for prosecuting public servants. The Court emphasized that the allegations of conspiracy and financial loss under Section 13(1)(d) and Section 120-B IPC warranted further investigation and cognizance. Consequently, the Supreme Court reinstated the order of the Special Judge, allowing the prosecution to proceed against the accused respondents.

Arun Kumar Aggarwal vs State Of M.P.& Ors · Niyam