Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-22

T. Laxman Kumar vs Pradeep Kumar Patil

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
T. Laxman Kumar
Respondent
Pradeep Kumar Patil
Bench
Jagdeesh Singh Khehar, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, affirming that the respondent-advocate acted on the appellant's instructions in not pressing the civil suit. The Court found no merit in the appellant's claim of forgery regarding the Memo (Exh.R/1) and noted that the appellant failed to demonstrate any negligence on the part of the advocate. The appeal was dismissed, but the imposition of costs of Rs.3,000/- on the appellant was set aside.

T. Laxman Kumar vs Pradeep Kumar Patil · Niyam