Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-09-30

Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare & Anr vs Sadhu Dadu Shettigar & Anr

Citation / case number
2011 AIR SCW 6067
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare & Anr
Respondent
Sadhu Dadu Shettigar & Anr
Author
R.V.Raveendran
Bench
A.K. Patnaik, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of possession and tenancy rights under the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, specifically referencing Section 11 and Section 24(4). The Court held that the respondents were not tenants but rather gratuitous licensees, as their claim of tenancy was unsubstantiated. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to possession of the suit portions, and the respondents' claims were dismissed, affirming the appellants' right to evict the unauthorized occupants.

Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare & Anr vs Sadhu Dadu Shettigar & Anr · Niyam