Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-10-17

PRINCL.CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST vs J.K.JOHNSON .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/12611
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRINCL.CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
Respondent
J.K.JOHNSON .
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR R.M. LODHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the authority of a specified officer under Section 54(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, to order forfeiture of seized items upon compounding an offence. The Court held that while the officer has the power to compound offences, the forfeiture of items seized is not permissible solely based on the payment of a composition fee. The judgment clarified that forfeiture requires a separate legal basis and cannot be automatically linked to the compounding of an offence under the Act.

PRINCL.CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST vs J.K.JOHNSON . · Niyam