Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-10-12

Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr vs Chakiri Yanadi & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 169
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr
Respondent
Chakiri Yanadi & Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the benefits of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, are applicable to the appellants, entitling them to equal shares in coparcenary properties. The Court emphasized that the amendment allows daughters to be treated as coparceners by birth, thus granting them rights to partition. The Court reversed the High Court's decision, affirming the trial court's ruling that the appellants are entitled to 1/4th share each in the properties `A', `C', and `D`.

Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr vs Chakiri Yanadi & Anr · Niyam