Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-10-13

Trilok Sudhirbhai Pandya vs Union Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 1668
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Trilok Sudhirbhai Pandya
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Author
A. K. Patnaik
Bench
A. K. Patnaik, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the appointment of Shri V.I. Gohil as the Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962, ruling that his appointment was not vitiated by bias despite being compensated by the respondent company. The Court emphasized that the Competent Authority's role did not involve adjudicating rights against the respondent, thus maintaining the integrity of the acquisition process. The Court affirmed the High Court's order, dismissing the appeals of the appellants.

Trilok Sudhirbhai Pandya vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam