Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-10-11

Fee Regulatory Committee vs Kalol Inst.Of Mgt

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Fee Regulatory Committee
Respondent
Kalol Inst.Of Mgt
Author
A. K. Patnaik
Bench
A. K. Patnaik, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's ruling that the Fee Regulatory Committee must consider the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission when determining fees for unaided professional educational institutions under the Gujarat Professional Technical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007. The Court emphasized that the revision of salaries for teaching and non-teaching staff is a critical factor in fee determination as per Section 11(1) of the Act. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to remit the matter back to the Fee Regulatory Committee for reconsideration, ensuring compliance with the legal framework established by the Act.

Fee Regulatory Committee vs Kalol Inst.Of Mgt · Niyam