SHISH RAM vs UNION OF INDIA .

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant from the Army, affirming that the brigade commander had the authority to dismiss him under Section 20(3) of the Army Act, 1950. The Court ruled that the appellant's failure to attend reservist training constituted grounds for dismissal, and as per Regulation 113(a) of the Pension Regulations, 1961, he was ineligible for pension and gratuity due to his dismissal. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the High Court's decision.