Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-11-22

B.T. PURUSHOTHAMA RAI vs K.G. UTHAYA .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/21207
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.T. PURUSHOTHAMA RAI
Respondent
K.G. UTHAYA .
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA G.S. SINGHVI
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA G.S. SINGHVI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the Special Leave Petition challenging the Karnataka High Court's judgment affirming the writ appeal that quashed the Land Tribunal's order regarding occupancy rights under Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Court held that the validity of the gift deed executed by Subbaiah and the subsequent agreement of sale between his sons must be examined in light of the tenancy claims. The Court emphasized the need for clarity on the possession rights and the implications of the Land Reforms Act on the occupancy rights claimed by the petitioner.

B.T. PURUSHOTHAMA RAI vs K.G. UTHAYA . · Niyam