Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-11-14

Shiji @ Pappu & Ors vs Radhika & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 499
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shiji @ Pappu & Ors
Respondent
Radhika & Anr
Author
T.S. Thakur
Bench
T.S. Thakur, Cyriac Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.6/2010, alleging offences under Sections 354 and 394 IPC, was justified as the offences were not 'personal in nature' despite a compromise between the parties. The Court emphasized that the nature of the offences involved does not allow for quashing based solely on personal settlement, referencing the precedent in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab (2008) 4 SCC 582. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision.

Shiji @ Pappu & Ors vs Radhika & Anr · Niyam