Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-11-08

Sri Laxman @ Laxman Mourya vs Divisional Manager, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (CIVIL) 383
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sri Laxman @ Laxman Mourya
Respondent
Divisional Manager, ...
Author
G.S. Singhvi
Bench
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, G.S.Singhvi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, compensation for road accident victims must encompass not only immediate medical expenses but also future medical care and the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity. The Court found that the Karnataka High Court's enhancement of compensation to Rs. 76,000 was inadequate given the appellant's significant disabilities, and emphasized the need for fair compensation reflecting the true extent of suffering and loss. The Court remanded the case for reassessment of compensation, ensuring a just outcome for the victim.

Sri Laxman @ Laxman Mourya vs Divisional Manager, ... · Niyam