Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-11-03

Union Of India & Anr vs M/S Nitdip Text. Processors (P)Ltd.& ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India & Anr
Respondent
M/S Nitdip Text. Processors (P)Ltd.& ...
Author
H.L. Dattu
Bench
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, H.L. Dattu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that Section 87(m)(ii)(b) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India by denying the benefits of the Kar Vivad Samadhana Scheme, 1998 to those in arrears as of 31.03.1999. The Court emphasized that such discrimination is unconstitutional and must be rectified to ensure equality before the law. Consequently, the appeals by the Union of India were dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

Union Of India & Anr vs M/S Nitdip Text. Processors (P)Ltd.& ... · Niyam