Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-11-15

Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Anr

Citation / case number
2011 AIR SCW 6740
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pratap Singh
Respondent
State Of U.P.& Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal of a judicial officer who was reverted to a lower position after not being promoted to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service, citing Rule 22(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The Court held that the remarks made in the officer's annual confidential report (ACR) were unjustified and lacked proper basis, emphasizing the need for fair evaluation in promotion matters. The Court ultimately ruled in favor of the appellant, reinstating him to his promoted position.

Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Anr · Niyam