Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-05-05

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND vs M/S. MANGAT RAM NORATA RAM NARWANA

Citation / case number
SC 2004/11292
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND
Respondent
M/S. MANGAT RAM NORATA RAM NARWANA
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of sanctions for prosecution under Sections 276C(1), 277, and 278 of the Income Tax Act. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to acquit the respondents, emphasizing that the prosecution failed to prove that the return was signed by respondent no.2, Hem Raj, as required under Section 276C(1). The Court clarified that insufficient evidence regarding the signature invalidated the conviction, despite the validity of the sanction for prosecution.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND vs M/S. MANGAT RAM NORATA RAM NARWANA · Niyam