Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-05-12

Pepsu Road Transport Corp., Patiala vs Mangal Singh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1974
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pepsu Road Transport Corp., Patiala
Respondent
Mangal Singh & Ors
Author
H.L. Dattu
Bench
H. L. Dattu, D. K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision allowing the respondent to exercise his option for the Pension Scheme under the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension/Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulations 1992, despite the respondent's failure to opt within the stipulated time. The Court clarified that Regulation 4 does not apply to employees reinstated by court orders, thus entitling them to pensionary benefits. The appeal by the Corporation was dismissed, affirming the High Court's directive for timely processing of pension benefits.

Pepsu Road Transport Corp., Patiala vs Mangal Singh & Ors · Niyam