Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-05-13

Mohammad Ahmad & Anr vs Atma Ram Chauhan & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1940
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mohammad Ahmad & Anr
Respondent
Atma Ram Chauhan & Ors
Author
Deepak Verma
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, a landlord can seek eviction of a tenant for personal bonafide needs. The Court emphasized that the tenant's continued payment of a nominal rent does not preclude the landlord's right to reclaim possession for legitimate needs, especially when the area has transitioned to a commercial zone. The Court upheld the lower court's decision to release the shops in favor of the landlord, affirming the necessity of balancing tenant rights with landlord needs.

Mohammad Ahmad & Anr vs Atma Ram Chauhan & Ors · Niyam