Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-18

RUDRA vs DIV.MNGR,NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.&ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/35766
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RUDRA
Respondent
DIV.MNGR,NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.&ANR.
Author
GANGULY
Bench
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the assessment of whole body disability at 29% by the Tribunal was justified and should not have been reduced to 15% by the High Court. The Court emphasized that the appellant's injuries warranted a higher compensation due to the significant impact on his earning capacity. Consequently, the Court enhanced the total compensation to Rs.1,48,200/- with interest at 6% per annum, thereby allowing the appeal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

RUDRA vs DIV.MNGR,NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.&ANR. · Niyam