Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-29

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER vs M/S MAKKAD PLASTIC AGENCIES

Citation / case number
SC 2010/34628
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER
Respondent
M/S MAKKAD PLASTIC AGENCIES
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan Taxation Board's order under Section 29(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, which determined that 'thermo ware' and 'vacuum ware' are distinct from plastic goods, warranting a sales tax rate of 10% instead of 8%. The Court affirmed that the Taxation Board's findings were reasonable and that the imposition of penalty was unjustified due to lack of evidence of mala fide intention for tax evasion by the assessee-respondent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, maintaining the Taxation Board's decision.

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER vs M/S MAKKAD PLASTIC AGENCIES · Niyam