Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-09

RAYMOND LTD. vs TUKARAM TANAJI MANDHARE .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/18668
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAYMOND LTD.
Respondent
TUKARAM TANAJI MANDHARE .
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the maintainability of complaints under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP Act), specifically Section 28 and Schedule IV. The Court held that employees engaged through contractors in industries governed by the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (BIR Act) are considered employees under the MRTU and PULP Act, thus allowing their complaints to be maintainable. The Court distinguished its previous rulings in Kalyani Steel Ltd and Cipla Ltd, affirming the applicability of the MRTU and PULP Act in such contexts.

RAYMOND LTD. vs TUKARAM TANAJI MANDHARE . · Niyam