Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-31

DEEPAK AGRAWAL vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/13354
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
Bench
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the U.P. Excise Group 'A' Service Rules, 1983, as amended on 17th May, 1999, which excluded Technical Officers and Statistical Officers from the feeder cadre for promotion to Deputy Excise Commissioner, was arbitrary and violated the principles of natural justice. The Court emphasized that vacancies arising prior to the amendment should be filled under the old rules, affirming the principle from Y.V. Rangaiah & Ors. v. J. Sreenivasa Rao & Ors. The Court directed that the appellants be considered for promotion to the post of Deputy Excise Commissioner based on the vacancies that arose before the amendment.

DEEPAK AGRAWAL vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam