Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-03

Centre For Pil & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1267
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Centre For Pil & Anr
Respondent
Union Of India & Anr
Author
S. H. Kapadia
Bench
Swatanter Kumar, K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, S. H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the legality of the appointment of Shri P.J. Thomas as Central Vigilance Commissioner under Section 4(1) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The Court emphasized that while the government is not accountable for policy decisions, it must ensure the legality of such decisions, particularly in the context of the High Powered Committee's recommendation. The Court held that the integrity of the decision-making process must be maintained, and any recommendation that does not adhere to the statutory requirements is void in law.

Centre For Pil & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr · Niyam