Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-08

Gangadhara Palo vs The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SC (CIVIL) 965
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gangadhara Palo
Respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr
Bench
Gyan Sudha Misra, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of a review petition due to a 71-day delay was erroneous, emphasizing that a liberal approach should have been adopted in condoning the delay. The Court clarified the doctrine of merger, stating that if a special leave petition is dismissed without reasons, the judgment of the lower court remains valid for review. Consequently, the Court condoned the delay and allowed the review petition to be considered on its merits, overturning the High Court's decision.

Gangadhara Palo vs The Revenue Divisional Officer & Anr · Niyam