Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-03-09

Raymond Ltd. & Anr vs Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raymond Ltd. & Anr
Respondent
Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare & Anr
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
Gyan Sudha Misra, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the maintainability of complaints under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP Act) concerning employees allegedly hired through contractors. The Court held that even individuals employed through contractors are considered employees under the MRTU and PULP Act, thus allowing their complaints to proceed. This decision clarified the applicability of previous judgments, including those in Vividh Kamgar Sabha vs. Kalyani Steel Ltd. and Cipla Ltd. vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, and emphasized the need for a consistent interpretation of employee status across different industrial laws.

Raymond Ltd. & Anr vs Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare & Anr · Niyam