Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-28

UMERKHAN vs BISMILLABI @ BABULAL SHAIKH .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/9123
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UMERKHAN
Respondent
BISMILLABI @ BABULAL SHAIKH .
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of adverse possession under Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the principles of partition under Muhammadan Law. The Court held that the High Court failed to consider the scope of the second appeal as per Section 100 and Section 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and thus restored the trial court's decree granting the plaintiff a 1/4th share in the property. The judgment emphasized that adverse possession must be established with clear evidence, which was not adequately demonstrated by the 1st defendant.

UMERKHAN vs BISMILLABI @ BABULAL SHAIKH . · Niyam