Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-28

GR.HYDRABAD MUN.CORP. vs M.PRABHAKAR RAO

Citation / case number
SC 2010/23418
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GR.HYDRABAD MUN.CORP.
Respondent
M.PRABHAKAR RAO
Author
A. K. PATNAIK
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, which ruled that the period of suspension of the respondent, a Bill Collector, should be treated as on duty, entitling him to back-wages and consequential benefits. The Court noted that under F.R. 54-B, the competent authority has discretion regarding the treatment of suspension periods, and since the respondent was acquitted of bribery charges, the suspension was deemed unjustified. The Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court's order that upheld the Tribunal's decision.

GR.HYDRABAD MUN.CORP. vs M.PRABHAKAR RAO · Niyam