Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-05

BAROT VIJAYKUMAR BALAKRISHNA vs MODH VINAYKUMAR DASRATHLAL .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/1466
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAROT VIJAYKUMAR BALAKRISHNA
Respondent
MODH VINAYKUMAR DASRATHLAL .
Author
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,
Bench
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the validity of appointments of Assistant Public Prosecutors made by the Gujarat Public Service Commission, which introduced a minimum qualifying mark for the viva voce shortly before the tests. The Court held that this action was illegal and constituted legal malafide, leading to the quashing of the select list and appointments. The Court directed a fresh selection process to be initiated, emphasizing adherence to statutory rules governing appointments.

BAROT VIJAYKUMAR BALAKRISHNA vs MODH VINAYKUMAR DASRATHLAL . · Niyam