Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-28

SHEELKUMAR JAIN vs NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/3234
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHEELKUMAR JAIN
Respondent
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. .
Author
A. K. PATNAIK
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, having resigned from his position in the Liberty Insurance Company, was not entitled to benefits under the General Insurance (Employees') Pension Scheme, 1995, as per Clause 22 which stipulates that resignation results in forfeiture of past service. The Court emphasized that the Pension Scheme, enacted under Section 17-A of the General Insurance Business (Nationalised) Act, 1972, does not apply to those who have resigned. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

SHEELKUMAR JAIN vs NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. . · Niyam