SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER vs JUGAL KISHORE SAMRA

The Supreme Court upheld the order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court affirming the Metropolitan Sessions Judge's directive that the interrogation of the respondent, Jugal Kishore Samra, must occur in the presence of his advocate due to concerns over his health and allegations of torture by DRI officials. The Court noted that the respondent's medical history, including heart disease, warranted such protective measures under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The ruling emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the rights of individuals during interrogation, particularly in cases involving health vulnerabilities.