Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-14

CHHOTELAL vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/1207
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHHOTELAL
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in light of Mulla v. State of U.P. (2010) 3 SCC 508, modified the sentencing aspect of the impugned judgment, affirming that while the sentencing court can prescribe the length of incarceration, the power to commute sentences or grant remissions lies with the Government. The Court held that a life sentence must extend to the full life of the convict, subject to government remissions. The appeal was dismissed, and the State Government was directed to decide on the appellant's continued detention or release within six months.

CHHOTELAL vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam