Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-04

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA vs G.C. JAIN

Citation / case number
SC 2003/12245
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA
Respondent
G.C. JAIN
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, which ruled that Butyl Acrylate Monomer (BAM) qualifies as an adhesive under the relevant customs notifications, specifically Notification Nos. 203/92 and 79/95. The Court found that BAM, although initially classified as an organic chemical, possesses adhesive properties upon polymerisation, thus justifying its import under advance licenses for adhesives. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's order to set aside the customs duty demand.

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA vs G.C. JAIN · Niyam