Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-11

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Nagpur vs M/S. Gurukripa Resins Pvt. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2011 SC 596
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr. Of Central Excise, Nagpur
Respondent
M/S. Gurukripa Resins Pvt. Ltd
Author
D.K. Jain
Bench
H.L. Dattu, D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 35-L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the classification of 'Rosin' and 'Turpentine Oil' by the assessee. The Court upheld the Deputy Commissioner's classification, ruling that the use of electric motors for lifting water constituted 'aid of power' in manufacturing, thus attracting a duty rate of 16%. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's dismissal of the assessee's rectification applications, confirming the duty liability under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Nagpur vs M/S. Gurukripa Resins Pvt. Ltd · Niyam